Skip to main content

Rafa: My Story


In the open era(till 2004) 5 Spaniards have won the French Open 6 times. Sergei Bruguera was the only man  who repeated the feat twice. From 2004 on, Rafael Nadal won the French Open 6 times in  7 attempts. No wonder he considers his game to be tailor made for the clay courts. Though he loved clay- which also explains his love for Monte Carlo- it was his dream to win Wimbledon

For a person whose game is entirely based on the power that he generates from his strokes, it is natural to go for every match as though it’s his last. When he lost the 2007 Wimbledon final to Federer, he wept under the shower for close to half an hour. What does the man do? He goes back and trains even harder. His belief in training has been steadfast from childhood

It was Toni Nadal, who made him revere him training with unconventional motivation. That Nadal had a no-nonsense approach towards winning helped Toni. When he saw the effort dipping, he would fire him up with more practice. Nadal remembers clearly that when he lost a match in his early days, he was gutted because he thought that a vacation with friends should have been spent on training instead. In his words “the fun I’d had with my friends during a carefree August could never compensate for the pain I’d felt at losing a match against a player I should have beaten. The pain came from the knowledge that I had given less than my best, that if I’d trained instead of played that August, I would have won my match”. All this was at the age of ten

It became easy for Nadal to win the age tournaments and almost everytime, Toni would put down the achievement. It was Toni who acted as a grounding base for Nadal all his life. Everytime he got onto the court he would see the opponent across the net as an equal who had to be vanquished. According to him, it was not Tennis that attracted him, but the competition associated with it

Members of family and people who know him well attribute his killer instincts on the court to his insecurities off it. They believe that since he found a lot many things that were beyond his control, he sought to put it in order in things that were under his control. It is this yearning for orderliness that makes him draw sips from two bottles at his side on the court, wear his socks at the same level on both legs

In stark contrast to autobiographies, he actually talks a lot lesser about himself and his choices and concentrates more on how training helped him. Toni mentions in the book that you are special, not because of who you are but because of what you do. It also veers off from  the beaten track in that, Nadal does not criticise his opponents but is full of praise for his two biggest rivals. He could have said a word or two about Berdych and Soderling. He would not have been setting as a precedent as Agassi did it in his book. Instead he sets a precedent by not talking about them

This grace and the ability to take things as they come are also attributed to training. He felt that one had to endure to go to that extra level. Endure did not just mean bearing but it meant stretching oneself beyond the capabilities, taking oneself to the next level

It was this single minded devotion towards training that helped him overcome a lot of obstacles in life. It is this training that he believes, helped him win the biggest match of his life- Wimbledon 2008 final

He rates the win highly. Two-thirds of the book is dedicated in how he achieved his childhood dream. He also rates the US Open 2010 final as it helped him in achieving the career grand slam. The narrative in the book almost revolves around these two triumphs

As he started out early in life for the pursuit of glory, there might be a feeling that he missed out on the joys of childhood but he does bring the child out of him as he speaks exuberantly about Davis Cup and Olympics

Final word: This book is not breezy as it goes about monotonously at places. Overall it’s an inspiring tale of a young boy who grew the ranks and went on to feature in debates of the ‘greatest player of all time’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer magnitude

Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol

BREAKING NEWS: Allu Arjun and Ravi Teja from Telugu movies make a fleeting appearance in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. Doesn't matter that they appear in a TV footage in the movie From the time it was announced that Anil Kapoor would be a part of the Mission Impossible franchise, it was marked as an awaited movie in India. It was widely anticipated that he would play a major role in the movie. Though he serves as a major connecting link in the movie or rather the main reason, why the movie moves to India, he is projected as a lusting billionaire One of the very good things about the movie is its humour content. There are a lot of subtle one-liners by the guy who operates the computer and is the technical guru in the movie. The movie is about an evil mind getting his hand on nuclear warhead and the mission is to stop a full blown war between USA and Russia There are a lot of things that are interlinked in the movie. For example, at the beginning of the mission when it’s sa

Jab Harry met Sejal

  I am writing this after Shahrukh Khan came out of the box-office rut with a movie called “Pathaan”. I am writing this about a movie that contributed to the box-office rut; Jab Harry met Sejal.   What can you say about the movie that’s unsaid? It’s an Imtiaz Ali movie. It will showcase travel. It will have the protagonists mouthing philosophical dialogues about love, life and relationships. It will have the protagonists “finding themselves” during the journey.   Shahrukh Khan and Anushka Sharma put in earnest efforts in the movie, but the movie lets them down. While I was watching the movie, the person next to me (who wasn’t even watching) asked if Anushka Sharma was playing a Gujarati in the movie. That in my eyes is Anushka Sharma nailing her bit.   The problem with the movie isn’t the premise but how the director deviates from the premise often. While it may be deliberate, it does seem that the director wants to leave his “signature”. At times, the movie does seem like