Skip to main content

Yendukante Premanta movie review


When I heard the songs of Yendukante Premanta, I wanted to see the movie for one song- Nee Choopule. I learned later that it was a source of huge relief to see it in the initial frames itself. Job done, I sat through the movie and couldn’t find a single thing I would remember after two days, bar the song

The initial scenes set the tone for the narrative. A narrative that refuses to move, and be linear. Karunakaran has a set pattern for his narrative. A motherless heroine, good in character, focussed, and morally on a higher plane. The goalless hero, whose life takes a turn after he meets the heroine and pining with unrequited love. And before we forget, the hero has a strict father (not in darling) who is made to look comical

So the story has nothing new to offer, but for a twist(!) in the tale. The twist here is, that everything is going to be good at the end and that’s announced about fifty minutes into the movie. Well, it is that sort of a movie. Every movie, especially the bad one’s, has a redeeming factor. That it is a song for Yendukante Premanta, is something that is hard to digest.

With nothing to offer, the movie stretches to 156 minutes. Not that it could’ve been any better if swathes of the movie weren’t there. Sometimes the viewer feels what difference a location can make to a movie. We needn’t jog back our memory a lot. Rewind to 2010, and we have the example of Orange. Orange could’ve been based in any of the cities in the world but the director insisted that it had to be based in Sydney as the protagonist was a graffiti artist. Add Yendukante Premanta to that list now. It could’ve been based anywhere but the director and producers are intent in passing off Switzerland as France (Paris with Switzerland flags. That must be a first). Before anybody can point fingers, there is a song that’s shot in Paris. The point here isn’t about the places. It is about the escalating costs. Yes, it is the home production for the hero, but it still doesn’t justify it

o   Ram
What made Ram sign on the dotted line? The non-existent storyline? The irrational concept? He is coming off a hit movie (Kandireega) and might justify the choice by saying it’s a ‘different’ film. Sorry to say, it ain’t. One good thing about his movies is the absence of vulgar content. Endukante Premanta, too joins the list. He has the skills and they can be put to very good use. Jagadam stands as a showcase for a director willing to bring the best out of this actor. He is slowly slipping into the Tarun mode and if he doesn’t take care, it might slip further in the same direction. He has developed a lot in the looks department though and looks set to play romantic roles, if he is willing

o   Tammana
It’s a pleasure to see Tammana, without the excessive skin show that we have grown accustomed too. Her pairing with Ram, looks fresh and energetic. It’s a pity that the script lets them down. Her deglamourized role in the initial minutes might go down well with her fans. She will be certainly considered a golden goose if the movie hits the bull’s eye at the box-office. If it doesn’t, she has an impressive set of movies lined up.

o   Karunakaran
The time has come for him to change tracks. For a discerning viewer, his movies are all the same. If he delivers duds with such talent at his disposal, then he will himself to blame for the future that awaits him. Ram and Tammana’s dancing skills are something that he should have utilised to the hilt, but he insists on making predictable, feel-good movies.

The only thing about the movie which is out of bounds for the complaints is cinematography. The cinematographer embellishes every frame in the movie. If only the movie had a good storyline


I put myself through the wringer by choosing this movie over Shanghai, and am repenting every bit. The only solace though, is the fact the tickets will be cheaper on a Monday morning show for Shanghai. The wait for the next good movie, unfortunately, continues…



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer magnitude

Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol

BREAKING NEWS: Allu Arjun and Ravi Teja from Telugu movies make a fleeting appearance in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. Doesn't matter that they appear in a TV footage in the movie From the time it was announced that Anil Kapoor would be a part of the Mission Impossible franchise, it was marked as an awaited movie in India. It was widely anticipated that he would play a major role in the movie. Though he serves as a major connecting link in the movie or rather the main reason, why the movie moves to India, he is projected as a lusting billionaire One of the very good things about the movie is its humour content. There are a lot of subtle one-liners by the guy who operates the computer and is the technical guru in the movie. The movie is about an evil mind getting his hand on nuclear warhead and the mission is to stop a full blown war between USA and Russia There are a lot of things that are interlinked in the movie. For example, at the beginning of the mission when it’s sa

Jab Harry met Sejal

  I am writing this after Shahrukh Khan came out of the box-office rut with a movie called “Pathaan”. I am writing this about a movie that contributed to the box-office rut; Jab Harry met Sejal.   What can you say about the movie that’s unsaid? It’s an Imtiaz Ali movie. It will showcase travel. It will have the protagonists mouthing philosophical dialogues about love, life and relationships. It will have the protagonists “finding themselves” during the journey.   Shahrukh Khan and Anushka Sharma put in earnest efforts in the movie, but the movie lets them down. While I was watching the movie, the person next to me (who wasn’t even watching) asked if Anushka Sharma was playing a Gujarati in the movie. That in my eyes is Anushka Sharma nailing her bit.   The problem with the movie isn’t the premise but how the director deviates from the premise often. While it may be deliberate, it does seem that the director wants to leave his “signature”. At times, the movie does seem like