Skip to main content

Djokovic and the art of winning


On 1st February 2009, Roger Federer broke into tears at the Australian Open presentation. The words that he uttered before breaking down were ‘God, it’s killing me’. There was a reason behind that. Though Federer will not reveal it, it was pretty clear. 2008 was a year that Federer couldn’t put it through Nadal

He lost the French Open final (expectedly) and then was at the receiving end at Wimbledon, which was later hailed as the ‘Greatest match ever played’ . All this came to a conclusion at the Australian Open final 2009, where for most part of the match, Federer had played the better tennis and even won more points than Nadal

This season, Nadal went through a similar run. He entered into 6 finals against Djokovic and lost in each one of them. It is not a co-incidence that Djokovic is having a dream run. In doing that, Djokovic has spread his wins over Nadal on all the surfaces- hard, clay, and grass

After he lost to him at the Wimbledon, Nadal acknowledged that Djokovic has gotten into his mind and he would need to play on a higher scale to put it across him. He did get the opportunity at Flushing Meadows but could not quite get there

When Nadal blazed away to a 2-0 lead in the opening set, it was thought that Nadal finally found a way to put it across Djokovic. However Djokovic was back to his imperious best as he reeled off six games in a row

The second set too followed a similar script as Nadal burst away to 2-0 lead, only to see Djokovic raise his own game and take the second set. He was in the danger of getting a drubbing similar to the one, that he gave Federer in the 2008 French Open

In the third set, Nadal was a break down early and in the latter half of the set, he got the forehand going. He was also having the long rallies in the match, go his way. After he won the third set, it was expected that he would exhaust Djokovic and take the match into the fifth set

Though Djokovic had problems with his lower back on the left side, he played a destructive game as Nadal was a mute spectator to the cascade of the shots from his racket. Djokovic not only won the final but also put it across Nadal tactically

There were two strokes that worked like a dream for Djokovic- the groundstrokes and the inside-out double handed backhand. His return of service was as exceptional as Nadal’s serve was poor. Nadal clocked early 100’s on his first serves. Djokovic feasted on these as he sent the returns rocketing back to Nadal at half volley length’s at the baseline

Nadal is normally quick to pounce on any sign of fallibility but here he could not capitalise on the number of unforced error’s committed by Djokovic in the second set. Djokovic, in fact did not play a perfect match but then he made sure that Nadal couldn’t rip that forehand of his

When Nadal wanted to get the wide serve going, it invariably found the net and his forehands, more often than not bounced long. In the third set, he tried to change the strategy a bit as he didn’t toss the ball as much. This was because he wanted to reduce the reaction time of Djokovic and he succeeded to an extent as he was able to hold his serve at crucial junctures of the third set

By the time the fourth set arrived, it clearly looked like Nadal ran out of steam. He wasn’t willing enough to chase down the balls and literally, he was running on empty

If the same trend continues then it isn’t far away from Nadal’s version of 2009 Australian Open final. This rivalry is a mouth watering prospect for the next season  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer magnitude

Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol

BREAKING NEWS: Allu Arjun and Ravi Teja from Telugu movies make a fleeting appearance in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. Doesn't matter that they appear in a TV footage in the movie From the time it was announced that Anil Kapoor would be a part of the Mission Impossible franchise, it was marked as an awaited movie in India. It was widely anticipated that he would play a major role in the movie. Though he serves as a major connecting link in the movie or rather the main reason, why the movie moves to India, he is projected as a lusting billionaire One of the very good things about the movie is its humour content. There are a lot of subtle one-liners by the guy who operates the computer and is the technical guru in the movie. The movie is about an evil mind getting his hand on nuclear warhead and the mission is to stop a full blown war between USA and Russia There are a lot of things that are interlinked in the movie. For example, at the beginning of the mission when it’s sa

Jab Harry met Sejal

  I am writing this after Shahrukh Khan came out of the box-office rut with a movie called “Pathaan”. I am writing this about a movie that contributed to the box-office rut; Jab Harry met Sejal.   What can you say about the movie that’s unsaid? It’s an Imtiaz Ali movie. It will showcase travel. It will have the protagonists mouthing philosophical dialogues about love, life and relationships. It will have the protagonists “finding themselves” during the journey.   Shahrukh Khan and Anushka Sharma put in earnest efforts in the movie, but the movie lets them down. While I was watching the movie, the person next to me (who wasn’t even watching) asked if Anushka Sharma was playing a Gujarati in the movie. That in my eyes is Anushka Sharma nailing her bit.   The problem with the movie isn’t the premise but how the director deviates from the premise often. While it may be deliberate, it does seem that the director wants to leave his “signature”. At times, the movie does seem like