Skip to main content

The Number One Conundrum


The media and the experts are crawling all over the Indian cricket team after the first two Tests. They have their reasons to do so. The supporters of the Indian cricket team, after having been through the high of World Cup victory, are just about to see their worst nightmares come true- Losing the Number one status in Test cricket

A lot of observers will put the loss down in the first Test to habit. The loss in the second Test was more shocking as it was due to ineptitude, inability and the lack of a stomach for a fight. In the two years of  their reign as numero uno, India were never a dominator but a team that had high bounce backeability quotient

It is as much an administrative failure as it is the players. Knowing the Indian players, the board should have seen to it that the players had more practice matches than one. It was essential for the players coming from the tour of Caribbean as it would have required a lot of effort to adapt to the conditions. Turns out that the players who performed well on that particular tour are the ones that are performing well on this tour too

Indians have for long have carried the tag of being sluggish starters. Considering the fact that they only tend to play 3-Test series and rarely 4-Tests, their efforts to get back into the series always have the pressure attached to them. It’s alright to draw series against your closest competitor on their pitches but when the same starts to occur on the home stretch then there is a cause for concern

In a drawn series between the two top teams, it is the team that is placed at the top that tends to lose out more. The problem with India’s reign as number one lies with the fact that they start an away series with evenly matched teams, as underdogs. Sunil Gavaskar attributed this to the inherent traits. He said as people, Indians are not ruthless. You need not be ruthless to be at the top. Being clinical is enough. Wonder what stops us from being clinical

That India have taken over the reign from Australia also matters a lot. Australia relinquished the position after what seemed like eons. Before them it was West Indies that dominated the top position for a long, long time. With both the West Indies and Australia, it had been a natural trait to dominate. It took a lot of stopping on the team’s part to halt their juggernaut. It was not that they were without frailities

What differentiated them from the teams of their time was the fact that they were clinical. They were quick to pounce on an opportunity and hunted the opponents down. That they tended to be bought down by strong individual performances was a giveaway that they were too good as teams to be bought down on a consistent basis

Though India has not been defeated in a series for the past two years, they are defeated consistently enough. In fact the tendency to lose the first Tests has been their bane. It goes without saying that the moment they lose the first Test, they are on the backfoot. Last year’s home series against Australia is a case in point as to what they can do if they can win the first match of a series. They were clinical and at their best in the second Test at Bangalore. For the first time, India blanked Australia in a Test series

It has been seen from the time of the reign of West Indies that the number one teams have been vulnerable against one particular team. If it was Pakistan for West Indies, and India for Australia, it turns out that India are now vulnerable against two teams- South Africa and England

More often than not it’s found that Zaheer Khan is injured for the first Test of the series and the rest of the bowlers find it tough to cope in his absence. Also the fact that Gambhir and Sehwag find their names on the injured list more often than not presents a unique headache. It was on the basis of the opening partnership between these two Delhiites that India rode to the top of the pile. Bench Strength is where India is lacking. Gus Logie, Simon Katich, Matthew Hayden, Damien Martyn, and Justin Langer will all attest the fact that a player has to make the most of whatever chances he is given or else they might end up in cold storage

The questions on number one are not unique to cricket. They exist in Tennis too, where Dinara Safina and now Caroline Wozniacki had their reigns questioned by not only the audience but also their fellow players. That India is not universally acknowledged as number one is a known fact. It is the respect that they need to command by their performances, that will make them one

The questions will certainly be answered by the end of India-England series. If India manage to latch onto their numero Uno position, they would do well to learn from their past failings and try to be assertive from the day one of the series  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Final : India V Sri Lanka

Tendulkar has finally become the most decorated player in World Cricket. After having the hefty tag of ‘God’ attached to him for close to a decade now, World Cup was the only thing that was missing from him. If it was him who carried the hopes of the cricket fans in India, then today it was payback time for him. The generation of players that were inspired by him bought home the cup. Nothing encapsulated this better than what Kohli said. He said “ He carried the burden for 21 years, now is our time to carry him” The match itself started off in a misleading manner as the captains were not sure of what the other meant to do and were steadfast in the belief that they won the toss. In the end, the referee wanted the toss to be conducted. In what has been a superb turnaround from 2003 final, Zaheer started this final in a superb manner- he bowled three maidens on the trot. On the other hand, the surprise selection for final, Sreesanth endured a tough time- exactly the way he started off t...

Cameraman Ganga tho Rambabu review

When asked his opinion on Monty Panesar, the legendary leg spinner, Shane Warne said “Monty hasn’t played 33 Tests, he has played the same Test 33 times.” Hilarious, it surely was, but it also tells us that the lack of variety can never go unnoticed. Puri Jagannadh is also treading the same path as Monty Panesar now. His movies have become monotonous. No two ways about it. Protagonist leading a normal life, rises in staure, opposes authority and finally, gets his way. This has been the standard flow in the majority of his movies. A more recent addition is the way they talk to/about women. In spite of all these blemishes, there are moments of brilliance in the movie, depending on your perspective that is. The scene where Pawan Kalyan confronts Prakash Raj on his knowledge about Telugu Thalli and the scene where he explains to Tamannah that every man is a poet in his own right are pointers to a brilliant dialogue writer hidden in the reckless director that we have come to k...

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer ...