Skip to main content

Steve Waugh: Out of my comfort zone

The basic difference between biography and autobiography is clear to many. The writing styles in the respective kinds will become more apparent when you read Mark Waugh’s biography and Steve Waugh’s autobiography

The book begins as a chronological narration of events and ends with his retirement in the Sydney Test against India in 2004. Since the book is voluminous, Steve Waugh has taken care to intersperse it with some anecdotes, which ofcourse add to the book. A sampler of them would be Shane Warne sledging Robert Croft. When Croft hits Warne for a six and stands looking at the replay appreciating his own efforts, Warne is quick to take a jibe at him saying “ Hey Croftie! You can have a look at the replays again in a couple of minutes” and he bowls him

The Childhood chapters aren’t given much pages except for talking about the ‘fibro’ background and talking about the competitive edge with Mark Waugh
What takes a chunk of the book though is his Test debut, 1987 World Cup win, Struggles to his first Test Century. For a guy coming up the ranks, he too is in awe of his state players, in his case New South Wales players. He seems to be particularly fond of Greg Ritchie, Greg Matthews, and Peter Taylor. He in fact goes on to describe Peter Taylor as one of the best containing ODI bowlers in the world at that time

His writing style tends to change once the team acquires the ‘winning feeling’. From then on it ebbs and flows according to his batting form. To his credit, he has tried to describe each and every event in a significant manner. Sometimes he succeeds but most times he tends to drag the narrative. He rushes through some incidents like Tendulkar’s desert storm innings, Laxman’s 281 and Lara’s brilliant 153 and just a fleeting mention of Butcher’s knock. What he does convey is his contempt for Ian Chappell, who he felt had a mongrel to pick with him

In the later pages it is the pay dispute that occupies a chapter and Tugga explains it in detail. Once you read the book, it becomes apparent that he has evolved as the time passes and his matured description of his sacking as ODI captain is something that you wouldn’t want to miss on

Once that’s done, he drags the narrative to his retirement from the game. What the book does establish is the character of the man. Before entering the Test level and while playing shield cricket for NSW, he seems to be in awe of Imran Khan. Once he enters the international arena, he seems to be keen on picking Richards wicket and describes keenly his duels with him

Although not directly but he offers his views on the captaincy styles of Allan Border and Mark Taylor. Of more importance is the overlapping period of his ODI captaincy with Taylor’s captaincy. With/without realising he too goes through a similar phase and more or less deals it in a similar manner

Though he does make a mention of match fixing scandal, he sidesteps it cleverly by merging it with pay disputes. He does not make bones about his dislike for Salim Malik though. Another mention of the match fixing comes up when he talks about Cronje and Azhar. He feels that the saga took a toll on his brother who was not the player that he was in final four years of his career, a pointer to which lies in the fact that Mark Waugh does not react to the negative comments of Richard Pybus after having been averse to negative press all his life

His insightful writing is a major plus to the book. The way he describes why the media, especially the newspapers, resort to sensationalism is a must read. There are a few instances of his relationship with Bob Simpson, Geoff Marsh and John Buchanan. He analyses the crests and the troughs of his relationship with them, based on these instances

He calls the Sydney Test Century of the last ball of the day against England as his defining event. That for the book is the part written by Lynette Waugh after Steve is done with his bit

Verdict: It is much like the man himself. Some he swats away with a straight bat and some passages are very engrossing. He does not at any point take advantage of the legacy that he has built. Like with most autobiographies, we would have wanted a in-depth analysis of few events. Whatever be the case, the book will ensure that it will be a companion for a few days


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer ...

Who is Shane Watson?

There is a dialogue in the novel Atlas Shrugged , which goes like this “If you saw Atlas, the giant who holds the world on his shoulders, if you saw that he stood, blood running down his chest, his knees buckling, his arms trembling but still trying to hold the world aloft with the last of his strength, and the greater his effort the heavier the world bore down upon his shoulders-what would you tell him to do?" "I . . . don't know. What . . . could he do? What would you tell him?" "To shrug." You   would not be mistaken if you can put Shane Watson in the place of Atlas in the above dialogue, just that as an Australian fan you would not want him to shrug It became more apparent from yesterday's match that Watson is the premier Australian cricketer now. That's quite an achievement from where he found himself in the early and middle part's of the last decade Watson was basically hyped up as the next all-rounder for Australia as soon as he en...

Cameraman Ganga tho Rambabu review

When asked his opinion on Monty Panesar, the legendary leg spinner, Shane Warne said “Monty hasn’t played 33 Tests, he has played the same Test 33 times.” Hilarious, it surely was, but it also tells us that the lack of variety can never go unnoticed. Puri Jagannadh is also treading the same path as Monty Panesar now. His movies have become monotonous. No two ways about it. Protagonist leading a normal life, rises in staure, opposes authority and finally, gets his way. This has been the standard flow in the majority of his movies. A more recent addition is the way they talk to/about women. In spite of all these blemishes, there are moments of brilliance in the movie, depending on your perspective that is. The scene where Pawan Kalyan confronts Prakash Raj on his knowledge about Telugu Thalli and the scene where he explains to Tamannah that every man is a poet in his own right are pointers to a brilliant dialogue writer hidden in the reckless director that we have come to k...