Skip to main content

Australia V England First ODI


The smirk on Lee’s face when Watson dropped a catch of Davies was indicative of so many things at once. One was frustration at the inability of his fielders to back-up his efforts and the other being to find himself in a team of normal mortals after being a part of champion teams


Strauss finds himself in charge of a team that is doing all the right things and even in this match, his team’s bowling was better than that of Australia. In the end, the only separating factor between both the teams was Shane Watson

The match started off in a fashion that was utterly reminiscent of the Ashes. England batsmen stitching a superb opening partnership and having the luck running their way throughout the entire span of the partnership. Haddin was helping them with his ineffective keeping. He regularly muffed stumping chances and was having a bad match in general. After what has transpired in the Ashes, it’s barely a surprise and the calls for including Tim Paine won’t be pushed to the background any further

Davies who was praised as a potential Gilchrist(!) by Vaughan lived up to his mentor’s statement in terms of runs but not in the quality of the stroke play. The only thing that comes across as even being remotely close to Gilchrist is his trait to go back to short pitched balls. What follows that is better left unsaid

Strauss was having a charmed run as inside edges went nowhere and edges were not carrying and he was being helped no end by Australian fielders to make his stay at the crease as comfortable as possible. No wonder then, that the openers got off to a blazing start. It was Hussey junior who broke through as he beat Davies’ ugly swipe and took the top of the off

With Trott too being dismissed cheaply the onus of building the innings fell on Strauss and a batsman who hasn’t crossed 49 in an ODI since November 2008. With Doherty in the team and his well publicised weakness against the left armers, it was thought the run would stretch

He broke the stretch and dispelled the fears of his fans when it comes to facing the left armers. He scored at more than run a ball of 20 balls of Doherty. It was a pity that he did not carry on to get a century and got out the only way he looked like he would- run-out

After his departure the innings just fell through. What looked like a 300+ score, ended up at 294

Australian innings was all about Watson. He went hammer and tongs after the batsmen so much so that Haddin was on 15 when he reached his half-century. The hundred plus partnership for the first wicket helped them no end as it meant that not only Australia kept up with the run-rate but also had wickets in the hand for a final blast. Haddin committed the cardinal sin of throwing away his wicket after he got his eye in. Clarke came in at the fall of Haddin’s wicket and stitched a partnership of hundred odd with Watson. Instead of setting up the match for Australia, it bought them down a couple of rungs because of Clarke’s low strike-rate. The worrying factor in this partnership was the fact that Watson was cramping up and had to endure a barren period after reaching seventy


Clarke got out in an attempt to up the run-rate. It was a crowd’s dismissal as they started to boo Clarke whenever he faced a ball. In a surprising move, Smith was promoted ahead of other established batsmen and did not shine. Hussey M removed some pressure off Watson by biffing Bresnan for a couple of good strokes

Once Hussey got out, White took some time settling in and then launched the counter-attack. By this time, Watson also re-aligned his meter and started going for the boundaries. Quite fittingly he finished the match off by launching Shehzad over long-on for a six

Lee must have felt good that future looks a little secured in atleast the shorter version of the game and must be smiling at the individual brilliance of Watson. After all, it’s a hark back to the halcyon days

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enthiran

There was a time , when I was a Chiranjeevi fan, to an extent that I even defended his flop movies such as Rickshavodu, Big Boss and others of the same ilk. For me he was was the ultimate star- the superstar. And hearing tales of Amitabh Bachchan from my father did nothing to alter my views on Chiranjeevi's superstardom Towards the end of my graduation, that is circa 2005 in April, two movies released- Mumbai Express and Chandramukhi. I went to Mumbai Express for the first day first show and was not impressed. Rajnikanth, coming off a colossal flop called  Baba  and Chandramukhi was touted to be his comeback vehicle. Since we had nothing to do, we dragged ourselves to Chandramukhi and I was impressed with the fact that as a superstar, he allowed the female protagonist to run away with the credit Well when Sivaji released, I got to see Rajni mania first hand and what a sight it was! I was in Bangalore and there was a serpentine queue to procure the tickets. The sheer magnitude

Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol

BREAKING NEWS: Allu Arjun and Ravi Teja from Telugu movies make a fleeting appearance in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. Doesn't matter that they appear in a TV footage in the movie From the time it was announced that Anil Kapoor would be a part of the Mission Impossible franchise, it was marked as an awaited movie in India. It was widely anticipated that he would play a major role in the movie. Though he serves as a major connecting link in the movie or rather the main reason, why the movie moves to India, he is projected as a lusting billionaire One of the very good things about the movie is its humour content. There are a lot of subtle one-liners by the guy who operates the computer and is the technical guru in the movie. The movie is about an evil mind getting his hand on nuclear warhead and the mission is to stop a full blown war between USA and Russia There are a lot of things that are interlinked in the movie. For example, at the beginning of the mission when it’s sa

Jab Harry met Sejal

  I am writing this after Shahrukh Khan came out of the box-office rut with a movie called “Pathaan”. I am writing this about a movie that contributed to the box-office rut; Jab Harry met Sejal.   What can you say about the movie that’s unsaid? It’s an Imtiaz Ali movie. It will showcase travel. It will have the protagonists mouthing philosophical dialogues about love, life and relationships. It will have the protagonists “finding themselves” during the journey.   Shahrukh Khan and Anushka Sharma put in earnest efforts in the movie, but the movie lets them down. While I was watching the movie, the person next to me (who wasn’t even watching) asked if Anushka Sharma was playing a Gujarati in the movie. That in my eyes is Anushka Sharma nailing her bit.   The problem with the movie isn’t the premise but how the director deviates from the premise often. While it may be deliberate, it does seem that the director wants to leave his “signature”. At times, the movie does seem like