I am writing this after Shahrukh Khan came out of the box-office rut with a movie called “Pathaan”. I am writing this about a movie that contributed to the box-office rut; Jab Harry met Sejal. What can you say about the movie that’s unsaid? It’s an Imtiaz Ali movie. It will showcase travel. It will have the protagonists mouthing philosophical dialogues about love, life and relationships. It will have the protagonists “finding themselves” during the journey. Shahrukh Khan and Anushka Sharma put in earnest efforts in the movie, but the movie lets them down. While I was watching the movie, the person next to me (who wasn’t even watching) asked if Anushka Sharma was playing a Gujarati in the movie. That in my eyes is Anushka Sharma nailing her bit. The problem with the movie isn’t the premise but how the director deviates from the premise often. While it may be deliberate, it does seem that the director wants to leave his “signature”. At times, the movie does seem like
Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors were names we knew from the countless tournaments they played and won. For instance, when McEnroe defeated Borg in a five-setter, I didn’t know that it was the first time Borg had lost a five-setter in 14 times. Time and again, he found the resolve to come back from a deficit and plot a Houdini-like escape. So, when he lost that game, something broke within him as well. I have not seen an author, apart from Gideon Haigh, write about his subjects without talking to them. He relied on books on them for his research. He acknowledges the help he got from these books and lists all of them out. When he talks of Bjorn Borg as a Viking god, you might think that this is another one of those books that speaks highly of its subjects. As you keep reading, you also find out that he explores the vulnerabilities of these players without being rude or actually prying on them. He talks in detail about Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Jimmy Connors, Illie Nast